Use Manus for small coding builds and bug fixes

A reviewer put Manus through eight programming chores and found it dependable overall, with a few weak spots in validation and proof of execution.

Done with Manusยท Intermediate

What they did
In September 2025, a reviewer assigned Manus eight independent coding jobs. Those jobs ranged from a Python currency converter and a broken find_max repair to a bubble sort explanation, a landing page, a React starter, and a Guess Who game. Each response was judged on whether it executed, covered edge cases, checked inputs, explained its logic, stayed accessible, and included sample output.
How it went
The average score came out to 4.69 out of 5, and four tasks received perfect marks, including the find_max fix, where Manus located all three defects. Points were lost when it skipped explanations, did not actually run its JavaScript, let weak email checks through, and produced a Guess Who game that only handled keyword-style questions.
Tips
This was measured on an earlier Manus release, before 1.5 and 1.6. For code work, treat its first pass as a draft and verify the output yourself.

Try it yourself with Manus

Build a [small program] in [language] that [requirements]. Then inspect this code and correct any bugs: [paste code]. After that, run it against a few test cases and give back the final code, the test results, and a short note explaining the changes. Before any action that would submit, delete, send, or make another irreversible change, pause and ask me to approve it.

Fill in the [brackets]. Agents can make mistakes, so review anything before it is sent, paid or deleted.

Read the original on secondtalent.com โ†—

Get 3 agent uses like this every morning

With the day's top AI news. Free, and one click to unsubscribe.