Use an agent to spot landing-page disclosure issues

An in-house lawyer wanted an AI precheck for marketing pages before the legal team saw them.

Done with Custom agent· Intermediate

What they did
On Reddit, an in-house lawyer shared a roundup of the AI systems they rely on for writing, checking, and background research. They also said they wanted support with promotional material, especially landing pages that have to line up with consumer-protection rules. In a comment, someone sketched a custom screening bot that marketing could run first, using ROSCA and similar standards to catch problems such as negative-option phrasing or disclosures that are not clear enough.
How it went
Nothing in the discussion shows the screening bot was actually created or put to work. There were no metrics, validation results, or rollout details, so the example mainly shows interest in getting this kind of early filter into the legal workflow.
Tips
Use the agent as a sorting step, not as the final decision-maker. Ask it to highlight weak claims and disclosure gaps, then pause for a human review before anything is published or submitted.

Try it yourself with Claude

Review this marketing page as an initial legal screening step. Compare the copy against [jurisdiction, rule set, or policy] and flag any claims, omissions, or phrasing that could create compliance risk. For each flag, include the exact excerpt, a short explanation, and a safer rewrite. Finish with a simple status: pass to legal or revise first. Do not proceed to publishing, sending, filing, or any other irreversible action until I approve. Marketing copy: [paste text here]

Fill in the [brackets]. Agents can make mistakes, so review anything before it is sent, paid or deleted.

Read the original on reddit.com ↗

Get 3 agent uses like this every morning

With the day's top AI news. Free, and one click to unsubscribe.