Review many PRs using a terminal agent

Meta's Muse Code checked 222 pull requests quickly and cheaply, but it also made a plan around a Google project that was not real.

Done with Meta Muse· Intermediate

What they did
A hands-on test covered Meta Muse Code, a terminal-based agent, along with installation steps, default sandbox behavior, approval gates, and multiple helper agents running in separate git worktrees. In the strongest independent run, the agent was pointed at a large batch of pull requests, and in another test it spent a few minutes looking into a Google project before drafting a plan from that source.
How it went
The pull request review completed in less than five minutes and cost roughly ten cents. The planning test failed because the Google project did not exist, which the article treats as the agent's main weakness.
Tips
The low-cost tier is not a good fit for private code because it trains on your code and allows only 100 requests per minute. For proprietary work, the standard tier is the safer choice.

Try it yourself with Meta Muse

Using [tooling, such as the GitHub CLI], examine the current pull requests in [owner/repo]. For each item, explain the change, point out anything that seems stale, repeated, or risky, and recommend the next step. Rely only on facts you can verify in the repository, and clearly label anything you cannot confirm. Before you post a comment, merge, close, delete, submit, or do anything else irreversible, pause and show me the exact action for approval. Finish with a sorted table of the pull requests and your suggested action for each one.

Fill in the [brackets]. Agents can make mistakes, so review anything before it is sent, paid or deleted.

Read the original on codersera.com ↗

Get 3 agent uses like this every morning

With the day's top AI news. Free, and one click to unsubscribe.