Use spare AI quota to draft reviewable PRs

A founder pointed an agent at goals and task lists so it could turn leftover Claude and Codex quota into pull requests for review.

Done with ClaudeCodex· Intermediate· Oct 2026

What they did
They set up RemainderBot with a goals file plus one or more task-list sources. It could run manually or on a schedule; in scheduled mode, it checked how much subscription quota was left, looked at the time until the weekly reset, chose a task, created a fresh branch, and opened a pull request. The founder then reviewed the PRs on GitHub, and their comments and merge choices influenced what the bot tried next.
How it went
The system generated 111 pull requests, including prep for customer calls, a sweep of 31 GitHub organizations’ agent setup files, and self-contained demo prototypes. The writeup did not give an accuracy rate, and the author asked people to report any mistakes.
Tips
This setup depends on git, the claude or codex command-line tool, and an authenticated gh login. Even a short run with a 20-minute window used only a few percent of the weekly quota.

Try it yourself with Claude

I have a goals file at [path] and task sources at [path or link]. Review them, choose up to [number] small tasks that are concrete enough to finish quickly, and work on each task in its own branch inside [repo]. For every task, make the smallest useful change, open a pull request with a plain summary of the change and any assumptions, then stop and give me a list of the PRs. Before you do anything that would send, submit, delete, merge, or otherwise make a change I can’t easily undo, pause and ask me to approve that step.

Fill in the [brackets]. Agents can make mistakes, so review anything before it is sent, paid or deleted.

Get 3 agent uses like this every morning

With the day's top AI news. Free, and one click to unsubscribe.