Sort new arXiv papers before you read them

A weekly Codex agent finds fresh arXiv papers, records them once, and flags the ones worth closer attention.

Done with Codexยท Intermediate

What they did
They built a weekly Codex workflow that looks on arXiv for papers tied to their interests, such as AI alignment. The agent writes each new result into a CSV so repeat runs only handle unseen papers. It then classifies items into groups like worth keeping, worth a quick look, not relevant, repeated, off-topic, or methodologically weak, and moves the promising ones into a Zotero inbox that feeds a vector database.
How it went
The author says this makes related-work checking less error-prone and cuts down on time spent rechecking claims. They still verify the evidence on their own, and the post does not include any counts.
Tips
Start with a narrow triage system before adding extra layers, because an elaborate setup can take more work to maintain than it saves. Keep a human review step in place before anything is sent onward or used.

Try it yourself with Codex

Build a weekly agent for me that scans arXiv for new papers about [keywords or topics], saves each unseen item to a running CSV with [fields you want tracked], and assigns every paper to [my review categories] using [my rules]. For anything marked as worth saving, pause and ask for approval before you send it to Zotero or make any other permanent change. When the run finishes, show me the papers to review first and leave all prior entries untouched.

Fill in the [brackets]. Agents can make mistakes, so review anything before it is sent, paid or deleted.

Read the original on aisagroup.substack.com โ†—

Get 3 agent uses like this every morning

With the day's top AI news. Free, and one click to unsubscribe.